Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gleb Sakharov vs Ruben Ramirez-Hidalgo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sakharov vs Ramirez-Hidalgo analysis and find out who is favored!
Gleb Sakharov vs Ruben Ramirez-Hidalgo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sakharov 1 - 2 Ramirez-Hidalgo
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sakharov has won 50.63% of points on his second serve, while Ramirez-Hidalgo has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sakharov, in recent form, has won 54.89% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ramirez-Hidalgo has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.29% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sakharov has saved 63.64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ramirez-Hidalgo has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sakharov has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 8/ 4), with Ramirez-Hidalgo winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sakharov has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 122/ 62), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Ramirez-Hidalgo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 598/ 412), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 8% (W/L 1/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Sakharov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 8/ 4), where as Ramirez-Hidalgo has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Sakharov winning 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Sakharov winning 3 and Ramirez-Hidalgo winning 4. The last match between Sakharov and Ramirez-Hidalgo was at the Lisbon Challenger, 12-06-2017, First, Clay with Gleb Sakharov getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:55:6.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sakharov and Ramirez-Hidalgo have played a deciding set 1 times, with Sakharov winning 0 times and Ramirez-Hidalgo 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Sakharov winning 0, and Ramirez-Hidalgo 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sakharov has played against opponents with an average rank of 16.5 while Ramirez-Hidalgo has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sakharov has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ramirez-Hidalgo has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sakharov has converted 45.9% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ramirez-Hidalgo has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
868
Rank
153
High
35
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard0
1
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
50
High
46
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
60% (404-266)
Career Total W/L
56% (629-486)
73% (8-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$180,375
Career Prize Money
$478,730
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sakharov VS Ramirez-Hidalgo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Gleb Sakharov | Ruben Ramirez-Hidalgo |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 4 |
| Games Won | 28 | 36 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:55:6 | 0:55:6 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (64/105) | 52% (64/122) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (37/64) | 69% (44/64) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (23/41) | 50% (29/58) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (4/14) | 33% (7/21) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (49/122) | 43% (45/105) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
Sakharov VS Ramirez-Hidalgo H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Ruben Ramirez-Hidalgo
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
73)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats
Ruben Ramirez-Hidalgo
Player
Gleb Sakharov
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
| 4-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gleb Sakharov | Ruben Ramirez-Hidalgo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 71% (17/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (126/92) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 83% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 17 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.08 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 9 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:43 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 18 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (318/476) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (217/318) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (80/158) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (28/61) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (209/490) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 73% (8/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Gleb Sakharov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Gleb Sakharov
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
12
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Yanis Ghazouani Durand
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Antoine Hoang
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Hayato Matsuoka
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
92)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Antoine Berger
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
3
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
33 of
39)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
14 of
55)
57
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 3-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Rodrigo Alujas
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Igor Kudriashov
Player
Gleb Sakharov
49%
(
43 of
88)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
6
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Andrea Bolla
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve %
45%
(
13 of
29)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
92%
(
11 of
12)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
35
Total Points Won
13
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Ruben Ramirez-Hidalgo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Varillas
Player
Ruben Ramirez-Hidalgo
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Ruben Ramirez-Hidalgo
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
55)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
19 of
24)
100%
(
11 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sven Lah
Player
Ruben Ramirez-Hidalgo
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Donati
Player
Ruben Ramirez-Hidalgo
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Inigo Cervantes
Player
Ruben Ramirez-Hidalgo
57%
(
55 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ruben Ramirez-Hidalgo
Player
Markus Eriksson
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adam Pavlasek
Player
Ruben Ramirez-Hidalgo
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
41%
(
23 of
56)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ruben Ramirez-Hidalgo
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ruben Ramirez-Hidalgo
Player
Maciej Rajski
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcel Granollers
Player
Ruben Ramirez-Hidalgo
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
10 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Sakharov Vs Ramirez-Hidalgo Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
